Quantcast
Channel: RallyPoint.com
Viewing all 1044 articles
Browse latest View live

The Way Petraeus Saw Counterinsurgency Operations | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0


General (Ret) David Petraeus is one of the most highly acclaimed leaders from this most recent era of conflict.  He is perhaps best known for his counterinsurgency approach while commander of the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq.

Here, we've compiled 5 quotes from Petraeus that we believe best encapsulate his perspectives on counterinsurgency doctrine and the challenges of maintaining a lasting balance in a nation that has its own fundamental problems to begin with.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team


"President Obama has said that our aspirations should be realistic. We are not going to turn one of the poorest countries in the world, that was plunged into 30 years of war, into an advanced, industrialized, Western-style democracy. What we want to achieve is Afghanistan's capacity to secure and govern itself."

"If you don't want to have to kill or capture every bad guy in the country, you have to reintegrate those who are willing to be reconciled and become part of the solution instead of a continued part of the problem. And then, above all, the resources."

"Every civilian's death diminishes us, collectively."

"But clearly, this is what this is about. It's about pushing the security bubble out. It's about rooting out every last guy, so that there's not even somebody who can fire a single, solitary RPG round from some little qalat out here."

"This is actually true of the overall fight against al-Qaeda and trans-national extremists, that as you put pressure on them in one location, they'll seek safe haven sanctuaries in other areas. So you do have to continue to pursue them. But they have less capability."


Brotherhood: ‘I looked down, and my hand was completely missing’

$
0
0
Take time to read this inspiring story of duty, dedication, and sacrifice.  Gives you goosebumps to read this.

There is no bond stronger than the one among military brothers and sisters.

-- The RallyPoint.com team



When Cpl. Javier Alvarez, 2nd Squad leader, saw the look on his team leader’s face, he knew something bad was coming.

Pinned down and receiving first aid, Alvarez’s back was against the wall of the house, an insurgent nest. Seconds earlier, he had peered from behind a tank and seen a Marine from the lead squad lying face down in the sand in front of the house. So he had gathered his squad, took the point position and sprinted toward the danger to evacuate the casualties.

As he ran, Alvarez took three slugs into his legs.

"It felt like something hit me, and I looked down and I saw that I was bleeding," Alvarez said.

He made it to the wall, but the teammate treating his wounds felt the impact of an enemy round. So Alvarez grabbed his rifle, rolled to one side and returned fire into the house.

Spent of rounds, he turned on his back and was putting in his third magazine of his M-16 when he heard, "Grenade, grenade, grenade!"

It was still rolling on the ground.

"I have two or three seconds to get rid of this," he thought.

Alvarez grabbed it and spun himself around to lob it away.

"I don’t know if it went off in my hand or within a foot of it. It was pretty close," he said.

"And then it just went off and everything was black for a couple seconds until my — I think I just went into a — because of the G-force of the grenade, it made me black out for a couple seconds and then I came back to. Everything started coming back and I started visualizing again."

Alvarez struggles to tell his story. His speech is filled with pregnant pauses, disjointed phrases and unfinished thoughts.

It’s the cost of saving the lives of six Marines. It is his price for his Silver Star.

"I know my hand was burning," he recalled. "Or, it felt like that. So I lifted up my arm to see what happened, and my hand was completely missing. There was just like ragged bone sticking out, with my sleeves from my uniform black and red from blood," he said.

Alvarez knew this was coming. This was his third deployment in three years. He joined weeks after 9/11. He was among the first Marines into Iraq in 2003. He survived Fallujah without a scratch. When his wound comes, he thought, sitting around is not an option.

"I can’t just shut down and not function, that’s not going to help my squad out," he told himself. "I had already thought about that pretty intensely."

Alvarez’s story is yet another tale of heroism born on the morning of Nov. 16, 2005.

Marines of 2nd Platoon, Fox Company, were on their 12th day of Operation Steel Curtain, a dangerous mission to clear houses in Anbar province, when two dozen insurgents made a last stand.

By the time the explosion tore apart Alvarez’s hand, two Marines were dead. By the end of the day, 16 men were wounded, five of them mortally.

"It seems like it might be slow motion at some points, but then you find that it’s all happening in a heartbeat. It’s seconds," Alvarez said.

More than three years later, Alvarez has a lifetime to live with his wounds. He wears a brave face.

"I’m missing my hand, and I got shot, and I got shrapnel and all that stuff. But there are guys that are missing two legs, and they are 95 percent burned. To me, that — I don’t know how they overcome it everyday. And that’s — that’s my motivation, to see them do it."

He added, "I didn’t mourn over my losses or injuries. I had a mission to accomplish and I had other stuff that was going on. I had Marines I had to take care of."

But he is being modest.

Mirrors still give him pause.

"I think that’s when it hits me, you know, that I’m missing my hand," he said.

He used to do calligraphy, but for the last couple of years he has practiced drawing circles and straight lines left-handed.

"My wife has been extremely supportive in everything I do. I do have times where it’s frustrating. You need hands to do things, to do daily things. You need both of them, sometimes, for the most part, and I only have one," he said.

If they have children, he worries he won’t be able to toss them in the air like other dads.

Alvarez is now 28, and a student at the University of Arizona’s College of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, in Tucson. His wife stays up nights with him, helping craft delicate and intricate models.

Alvarez probably will envision design solutions able-bodied students often overlook, according to Jan Cervelli, dean of the architecture school. But computers will allow him to work one-handed fairly easily.

What truly sets him apart, she said, is that he is a Marine and a veteran of war.

"Clearly, he’s going to be a leader in the profession going forward," she said. "I’m going to make sure this is something that the entire campus is aware of, including the college. We have a hero here, and we need to really celebrate that."

(VIDEO) "I'm hit!" - Soldier's Helmet Cam Captures His Firefight | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0


When you're in the midst of incoming rounds, life can almost seem surreal as you focus on maneuver and the principles and tactics you've learned.

We don't have a lot of context for this specific situation, but it's a vivid and raw depiction of what ground missions can be like through a Soldier's eyes in Afghanistan.

Respect.

-- The RallyPoint.com team





DoD Looking to Cut AFN and Stars & Stripes | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

It should come as no surprise that with the Pentagon's uncertain budget limitations moving forward, even storied historic media like American Forces Network (AFN) and the Stars & Stripes publication are in the cross hairs.

It's tough to imagine a military without AFN or Stars & Stripes, especially given how much so many of us have enjoyed both outlets over the years, especially while deployed OCONUS.

Is cutting these a good or bad idea?

-- The RallyPoint.com team

----------------------

Stars and Stripes

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon, under intense pressure to maintain American military might in an era of sequestration and falling budgets, is considering the elimination of Stars and Stripes and the Pentagon Channel as well as programming cuts to American Forces Network.

The Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation office, which answers to the secretary of Defense, has been tasked with reviewing spending on all such media products.

The Pentagon typically refuses comment on budget studies while in process, and when asked for information on the scope and intent of the review, officials would only say all of DOD is currently the subject of a top-to-bottom spending review ordered by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

Related: Stars and Stripes sequestration coverage

“In this budget environment, we’re looking at everything,” said Navy Cmdr. Bill Urban, spokesman for the cost assessment office.

Bryan Whitman, principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for public affairs, referred queries on the matter back to Stars and Stripes managers and Defense Media Activity.

Ray B. Shepherd, the head of the Defense Media Activity, which oversees all three outlets, refused to elaborate on the study.

“We’ve been asked to look at everything,” Shepherd said.


Although the parameters of the review are unclear, Stars and Stripes publisher Max Lederer said budget officials have been making unprecedented requests for information.

He said he’d been tasked with providing budget numbers and scenarios for cuts — sometimes given just hours to do so — without being told why the review was underway.

“When you get asked questions in a vacuum, you get concerned,” Lederer said.

According to Shepherd, the 2013 budget for American Forces Radio and Television Service was $51.6 million, and costs for the Pentagon Channel about $6.1 million.

Stars and Stripes’ DOD subsidy for 2014 was $7.8 million, according to its chief financial officer, Bill Murphy. The majority of the paper’s budget comes from advertising, newspaper sales and other staff-generated revenue.

While the American Forces Network and The Pentagon Channel are command-directed information outlets, Stars and Stripes is editorially independent under federal law. The newspaper, which distributes its daily print paper in the Middle East, Asia and Europe and maintains a growing online presence, is staffed almost exclusively by civilians and has a civilian ombudsman who answers to Congress.

Asked Wednesday, senators with the Armed Services Committee, who must consider deep cuts in end strength for the services, cuts to weapons programs and trimming of military benefits, said they had not been apprised of any such review.

“I had just heard rumors,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “But I think it would be a terrible mistake, I really do. The men and women who are serving get a lot of their information this way. It’s a great conduit to spread information to the men and women who are serving all over the world.

“Armed Forces Network, among many other things, does sports, which all of our men and women love,” McCain said. “So I think it would be crazy.”

Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., agreed.

“I don’t like the idea. I certainly acknowledge [the Pentagon has] some really difficult choices ahead, and I’d want to look at it, but I think an independent editorial voice like Stars and Stripes provides is pretty darn important for transparency and accountability and oversight in the military.”

----------------------

Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.
-- Bob Dylan





(MUST SEE) Army Veteran Daniel Rodriguez Scores for Clemson | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
The RallyPoint.com salutes Purple Heart recipient and Clemson football walk-on Daniel Rodriguez for scoring his first touchdown.

Rodriguez spent 2.5 years deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Enjoy the clip below!

-- The RallyPoint.com team


---------------------------

By Nick Bromberg

If there's a bright side to college football powers scheduling FCS teams, its that players who wouldn't normally get to play get a chance for some game action. And Clemson's 52-6 win Saturday against The Citadel was the perfect opportunity for Daniel Rodriguez.

Rodriguez, a Purple Heart recipient, scored on a little push pass fly sweep in the fourth quarter. Yeah, the touchdown made the score 52-3, but that doesn't the diminish the coolness of the story.

The 25-year-old was wounded in 2009 during the Battle of Kamdesh, one of 22 who were injured. Before he spent a year in Afghanistan, he spent 1.5 years in Iraq. After Kamdesh, he was awarded the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal.

He joined the military after the death of his father. Rodriguez was planning on playing football in college after high school, but his father died four days after he graduated. With poor grades, and what USA Today termed "a splintered family," Rodriguez joined the Army. His first college football experience was seven years after he last played in high school.

Rodriguez, a redshirt sophomore, was able to walk on via the GI Bill at Clemson after the school offered to submit a waiver for immediate eligibility in 2012. He caught three passes that season and entering Saturday, had five catches this year.

Now he has a touchdown.



---------------------------

(Warning: Graphic) Apache Destroys Platoon-Size Taliban Element | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0


Please read the following note before watching the video clip below.

The purpose for posting this video is for those who have never deployed to better understand what it means when a veteran/service member has difficulty dealing with the things he/she has seen and done while deployed.  Going down range is not a video game -- real people get hurt and killed.  And, coping with PTSD challenges is not a joke -- people's lives are affected forever by these situations.

Warning: The contents of this video are graphic and involve the elimination of what we presume to be enemy combatants, without further insights into the tactical situation being portrayed here.  

We would caution you to not make judgments as to the conduct of these pilots, because you don't know the full extent of the mission set.

-- The RallyPoint.com team





7 Crazy Facts You Probably Don't Know About the Marines | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

How well do you know the Marine Corps?

Well, we're going to test you.  Actually, we didn't know a few of these points below.  The Marines are among the most revered combat maneuver organizations in the world, and have a fabled ferocity that is unmatched.

So, let's see what you didn't know about them below!

-- The RallyPoint.com team


--------------

1. THE FIRST RETIRED MARINE TO EVER RECEIVE AN HONORARY PROMOTION WAS IN A STANLEY KUBRICK MOVIE.

In Full Metal Jacket, actor Tim Colceri is famous for his helicopter scene wherein he says over machine gun fire, "Anyone who runs is a VC. Anyone who stands still is a well-disciplined VC." He would have been even more famous in the part for which he was originally cast—as the strict and unrelenting senior drill instructor, Gunnery Sergeant Hartman. That role, however, went to R. Lee Ermey, who had been hired for the film as a technical advisor.

Ermey, a former Marine drill sergeant and Vietnam veteran, filmed a tense 20-minute reel of himself in character dressing down and squaring away the movie’s extras, without repeating himself, all while being pelted with tennis balls and oranges. When director Stanley Kubrick saw the video, he recast Ermey for the role on the spot.

Hartman became perhaps the most famous gunnery sergeant in the history of the Corps. Ermey, however, retired as a Staff Sergeant. In 2002, the Marine Corps granted him an honorary promotion in accordance with the rank for which he is most associated. He is the first retiree in the history of the Marines to receive such an honor.

2. THE PHRASE “A FEW GOOD MEN” IS OLDER THAN THE MARINE CORPS.

On March 20, 1779, Captain William Jones of the Continental Marines placed a recruiting advertisement in the Providence Gazette: "The Continental ship Providence, now lying at Boston, is bound on a short cruise, immediately; a few good men are wanted to make up her complement." He’s been recruiting Marines ever since.


3. ...TO THE SHORES OF TRIPOLI

In 1801, the United States decided to do something about piracy in the Mediterranean, and President Jefferson sent in the Navy. In 1805, the Marines finished the job. The Battle of Derne, on the shores of Tripoli during the First Barbary War, was the decisive action of the war, and the first overseas land battle fought by the United States military.

In 2011, the U.S. Marine Corps returned to Libya as part of Operation Odyssey Dawn.

4. WHY ARE THEY CALLED LEATHERNECKS?

In 1798, the Marine Corps began issuing "one stock of black leather and clasp" to Marines. The item was worn to protect their necks when fighting with swords. Today, the standing collar on the dress coat of the Marine Corps uniform is a vestige of the leatherneck tradition.

5. THE MARINES WERE HELD BACK AT NORMANDY.

The purpose of the Marine Corps is amphibious warfare, or attacking the land by storming from the sea. And yet the Marines are largely absent from the Normandy Invasion—history’s most famous amphibious assault. Why did the Army get the job?

More people. The Army had 89 divisions; the Marine Corps had 6. (As goes the saying, “The Marines win battles; the Army wins wars.”) Perhaps more importantly, however, is that there was an ongoing rivalry between the Army and the Marines. Because the leaders of the Allied Forces were Army generals, there was no chance they’d share the spotlight on the biggest operation of the war. Even when the invasion looked grim, the Marines who watched from the U.S.S. Texas were never unleashed. As journalist W. Thomas Smith has written, the leadership didn’t want headlines the next day to read “Marines save Rangers at Normandy.”

Marines assigned to the Office of Strategic Services, forerunner to the CIA and U.S. Army Special Forces, were on the ground, however, secretly working as observers of the invasion, and facilitators for Army paratroopers who were jumping behind enemy lines.

6. WHEN THE FAST FOOD WARS ARE FOUGHT, A MARINE WILL COME OUT ON TOP.

In the 1993 film Demolition Man, Sandra Bullock’s character makes reference to the Fast Food Wars, of which only one restaurant survived—Taco Bell. This is probably in no small part because the founder of Taco Bell was Glen Bell, a Marine who served in the Pacific Theater in World War II.

The Fast Food Wars would have been quite savage, however. Mike Ilitch, founder of Little Caesars, and Tom Monoghan, founder of Domino's Pizza, are also former Marines.

7. THE CORPS WAS BORN IN A BAR.

The U.S. Marine Corps celebrates its birthday on November 10, 1775, the day the Second Continental Congress passed the Continental Marine Act of 1775, ordering, “That two battalions of Marines be raised...” The Continental Marines disbanded in 1783, and was formally reestablished in 1798. The first Marines enlisted at Tun Tavern in Philadelphia, which is considered the birthplace of the Marine Corps.

During the annual birthday celebration, Order No. 47 is read, which says in part, “it is fitting that we who are Marines should commemorate the birthday of our corps by calling to mind the glories of its long and illustrious history.” The commanding officer cuts the birthday cake, and the first piece is given to the oldest Marine present, who passes it to the youngest Marine present.

Hat tip to Mental Floss for some of these facts.
--------------

Outrage as Pub Forced To Take Down “Thank A Veteran For Your Freedom” Display | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0


A bar in Huntington Beach, CA is being threatened with a ~$1,000 fine if the owners do not take down a sign that pays respect to veterans by reading, "Thank a veteran for your freedom."

The bar owner is fighting the decision, and has said that if he is indeed forced to remove the sign, he will invite local vets to pay final respects.

What do you think should happen in this situation?  Tell us here.

-- The RallyPoint.com team

-----------------

By Anthony Clark Carpio

A Huntington Beach bar was cited for erecting a sign thanking military veterans for their service, which has generated a backlash against city officials.

Perched atop Johnny's Booze and Pool, the sign reads: "Thank a veteran for your freedom," with the National League of POW/MIA Families logo next to it. But the sign is being threatened after city code enforcement officials asked the bar's owners to produce proper permits for the sign or remove it and face a fine of nearly $1,000.

The bar's owner, Johnny Kresimir, told the Huntington Beach Independent he was surprised by the city notice. The sign, he added, has been in the same place for six years.

"If the sign goes down, it's not going to hurt our business. It's just going to hurt the community," Kresimir said.

A notice was left on the bar's door Monday after an anonymous complaint was received earlier in the day, according to the city. But that action has since generated a backlash against the city, on social media and and in the form of an online petition in favor of the sign.


Kresimir took to Facebook, alerting the public to the fact that the city was giving him two days to remove the metal structure or he would be fined.

Veterans and supporters of the saloon chimed in, posting reasons why the sign should remain. Even Mayor Pro Tem Matthew Harper voiced his support for the fixture, saying he would defend it if the issue came before the City Council.

Kresimir, meanwhile, said he has cooled off a bit since then and spent much of Tuesday afternoon talking with city officials.

"They've contacted me and said that they won't fine us until we're able to meet and talk about the sign," Kresimir said.

Johnny's saloon opened in Huntington Beach in 2003 after moving from Hemet after Kresimir's father died. The bar added the sign above its portion of the strip mall roughly six years ago, although Kresimir noted that the metal structure holding the sign had been there well before he moved in.

But Huntington Beach officials say they need to ensure the structure is safe.

"As with any structure — especially one that is placed on a rooftop — we want to ensure that the structure is sound and engineered correctly," Planning Director Scott Hess said in a statement. "We have been unable to locate a building and electrical permit for the roof sign, so we need the owner to demonstrate that it has been permitted."

For his part, Kresimir said that if he's forced to take the sign down, he'll invite veterans from throughout the community to pay their last respects.

-----------------
 

Iraq By The Numbers: The Staggering Cost of War | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0


It's hard to know where to start when reflecting back on the war in Iraq and all the time we spent there, not to mention the lives altered or lost altogether.  We lost a lot of good brothers, sisters, and friends there.

Business Insider has released this startling set of data regarding the conflict.  Note that this is not a politically-biased post on our part -- we're just bringing you the interesting facts that you probably don't know already.  Also, some of the data (for example, the casualty stats) may not be perfectly up to date.

-- The RallyPoint.com team


----------------------------
Business Insider

The Iraq War was so messy and costly that the best attempt to assess the sheer damage is through numbers. We drew from sources including various news reports, The Brookings Institute 's Iraq Index, and the Costs of War Project to money and blood spent on the war.

189,000: Direct war deaths, which doesn't include the hundreds of thousands more that died due to war-related hardships.

4,488: U.S. service personnel killed directly.

32,223: Troops injured (not including PTSD).

134,000: Civilians killed directly.

655,000: Persons who have died in Iraq since the invasion that would not have died if the invasion had not occurred.

150: Reporters killed.

2.8 million: Persons who remain either internally displaced or have fled the country.

$1.7 trillion: Amount in war expenses spent by the U.S. Treasury Department as through Fiscal Year 2013.

$5,000: Amount spent per second.

$350,000: Cost to deploy one American military member.

$490 billion: Amount in war benefits owed to war veterans.

$7 trillion: Projected interest payments due by 2053 (because the war was paid for with borrowed money).


$20 billion: Amount paid to KBR, contractor responsible for equipment and services.

$3 billion: Amount of KBR payments Pentagon auditors considered "questionable."

$60 billion: Amount paid for reconstruction, (which was ruled largely a waste due to corruption and shoddy work.)

$4 billion: Amount owed to the U.S. by Iraq before the invasion.

1.6 million: Gallons of oil used by U.S. forces each day in Iraq (at $127.68 a barrel).

$12 billion: Cost per month of the war by 2008.

$7 billion: Amount owed to Iraq by the U.S. after the war (mostly due to fraud).

$20 billion: Annual air conditioning cost.

Missing: $546 million in spare parts; 190,000 guns, including 110,000 AK-47s.

40 percent: Increase in Iraqi oil production.

$5 billion: Revenue from Iraqi oil in 2003.

$85 billion: Revenue from Iraqi oil in 2011.

$150 billion: Amount oil companies are expected to invest in oil development over the next decade.

$75 billion: Approximate amount expected to go to American subcontracting companies, largest of all Halliburton.

0: Nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction found (though a bunch of chems were discovered).

Perhaps most importantly, this list doesn't account for the emotional damage caused to service members and their families as well as the destruction to the homes, social fabric, and psyche of the Iraqi people.

Hat tip to Business Insider for parts of this article.

----------------------------

7 of the Worst Military Decisions Ever Made | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

Here at RallyPoint.com, we're huge fans of military history, for as George Santayana said, "Those who do not read history are doomed to repeat it."

After studying tons of battles, campaigns, and key strategic decisions, the RallyPoint.com team came up with this list of 7 of the worst military decisions ever.  We wanted to cover a massive span of history.

Did we leave anything out?  Tell us here.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team


Santa Anna's detour at The Alamo (February, 1836)
Rather than getting to the rebel capital, Santa Anna's Mexican army spent days fighting for an insignificant outpost that gave the Texan troops just enough time to prepare and defeat Santa Anna


Bay of Pigs (1961)
A United States-backed 1961 attempt to overthrow Cuban President Fidel Castro with 1,500 Cuban exiles who were heavily outnumbered when they reached the bay. Furthermore, the US-promised air support never came to aid the exiles.


Invading Gallipoli (1915-1916)
A combined British, Commonwealth and French attempt to capture Istanbul fails completely at the Gallipoli peninsula.


The Battle of Hattin (1187)
During the time of crusades, King Guy of Lusignan was fighting against the mighty Saladin of the Muslims. Unfortunately for King Guy, his troops were running low on water. The battle ended when Saladin found out about this and trapped his enemy in a plateau without water.


Nazi invasion of Soviet Union (September, 1941)
Hitler's ego-driven decision to split his army and invade the Soviets set Germany up for its defeat four years later.


Maginot Line (1930-1940)
France constructed sort of a tunnel after World War I to keep away invasions from Germany and Italy. Unfortunately for the French, they forgot to block out the France-Belgium border, a mistake which the Germans took advantage. France was conquered within 6 weeks due to this.


Operation Market Garden (1939-1944)
Attempting to end the war before Christmas on 1944, the British planned to encircle the Germans in the Ruhr Area. The plan failed when the Allies only had one road to advance through and were vulnerable from both sides.


Hat tip to this interesting site for parts of this article. 


(VIDEO) Schwarzkopf's Famous Rule #13 on Leadership | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

It's no secret that we here at RallyPoint.com are huge fans of the leadership teachings of General Schwarzkopf.  Perhaps his most famous rule on leadership is Rule #13.

I don't know how many times I've watched/read this over the years.  It's a must-do for leaders at all levels of the military.  We've included the transcript below for your convenience.

What would you add to this?  Tell us here.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team



Norman Schwarzkopf: People need to understand what leadership is all about. Leadership is not managing an organization. Organizations are made up of people. Leadership is motivating people. Leadership is about people. So, yes. You've got to be competent. There's no question about the fact that you have to have competence to be a leader, but you also have to have character. Good leaders are men of competence and character. Many times character is more important than the competence side of the house. So I tell people that the secret to modern leadership is two rules. Rule 13: When placed in command, take charge. The leader is the person who is willing to take the responsibility. There are a lot of other people out there who are willing to do the job, but they don't want to get hung with the loss when it happens. As a leader, you have to be willing to take the responsibility. You have to be willing to take charge. So, Rule 13 says, "When placed in command, take charge."

Busted: The Epic Saga of Ranger and SF Phony James Ingram | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
This article was originally posted at an excellent website that many of us know: Guardian of Valor. You can check out more stories like this there.

We'd like to bring you one of our favorites from their Wall of Shame, which appears to be from earlier this year. RallyPoint.com did not contribute in any way to this story. For those of you familiar with this story -- yes, we know this has been brought to resolution.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team


----------------------


Wow, this guy is stacked!

Ranger And SF Phony James Ingram, Busted At His Place Of Business, Brave Tactical Outfitters

Some of you emailed us about this guy, and as you know we are so backlogged, it takes time to get to each case, but Our friends over at thisainthell busted him out today. Meet fake Ranger/SF, James Ingram. Ingram used his phony status to gain customers for his business, Brave Tactical.

Not only does he sport a Ranger and SF tab on his uniform, but he also has a tattoo of a Ranger tab. He is also sporting a CIB, Pathfinder, Air Assault and what possibly looks like the Army Scuba Badge, although I can’t be sure about that one due to picture quality.

A real Ranger spotted the faker on the  U.S. Army Ranger Association (USARA) Facebook page, and decided since he lived close by, he would confront him. The following is from an affidavit against Mr. Ingram, we have a copy of this sent to us from the person who wrote it.

On or about 23 DEC 2012 it had been brought to my attention via the U.S. Army Ranger Association (USARA) Facebook page that there was another imposter at work. Lately, we have discovered about 2-3/week across the country. James Ingram came to my attention because he was close by and I’d been in Blue Ridge just a few days prior visiting clients (Dermatologists) and prospecting.

On 24 December I had some spare time and decided to drive to Blue Ridge to visit Ingram’s place of business and confront him about claiming to be a Ranger. His business was closed. So, I contacted some acquaintances that I know in the local law enforcement community.

They knew of Ingram and one even had his cell phone number. They called him immediately on my behalf and had him call me. Ingram agreed to meet with me at the local McDonald’s; a public place chosen because it would be mutual ground.

When he arrived, he was obviously distraught. He asked that we move to his place of business for this meeting. He had some anticipation about what was about to occur and I think he didn’t want to be embarrassed in the McDonald’s.

I followed him to his place of business. I was not threatening in any way and don’t fear others, typically. So, the venue didn’t matter much. I’m a leader and can get what I want by peaceful negotiations in almost any situation.

I was wearing a Ranger sweatshirt commonly issued to Ranger instructors. It’s black and has a very large Ranger tab across the front.

Not much was said initially when we arrived at his business. We met in the studio next to the store. A table was already out and he placed two chairs on either side of it. I sat down and he started talking. I listened intently.

He began a very long diatribe about his childhood, his personal life, his professional life, etc. He shared with me some documents that documented some of the military training he’d completed.

None of them were a Ranger certificate or an SF Q-course graduation certificate. His speech lasted almost 10 minutes uninterrupted. The latter half of it was a very long, tearful, sobbing apology for pretending to be a Special Forces soldier/veteran. It ended with something like, “Well, what do you want me to do? What do you want from me? How can I make this right?”

I was embarrassed for him. My response was very direct. I recommended that he stop lying to people about being in the Special Forces. I recommended that he publicly apologize and try to right things with the Special Forces community. I also told him, “I didn’t come here to find out if you were ever in the Special Forces.

I’m a Ranger. I want to see a Ranger School Graduation Certificate or a DD-214 stating that you completed Ranger School.”

His response was, “Well, I don’t have it. It’s not here. It’s at home.”

I stood up and said, “Well, let’s go” and moved towards the door with the intent of getting in my car and following him to his house to see this documentation.

He immediately broke down again with another tearful, sobbing diatribe about not being a Ranger, either. He was pathetic and I thought helping him with his problems would be the best way to handle this. I started counseling him at that point. He wasn’t the first imposter and he certainly won’t be the last. He was a human being.

There was nothing I could do to him or his business legally. Assaulting him right then and there wasn’t going to be productive and I didn’t want to have bloodied knuckles over Christmas. His behavior was despicable, but it wasn’t illegal and it was Christmas, after all. I fought for his right to lie, even, when I swore to defend the 1st Amendment and the rest of our Constitution.

He said he’d come clean. He said he’d tell his business associates and the public the truth. He then started flattering me and trying to build some friendly relationship when he realized that I wasn’t going to deliver the violent beat down he probably thought he deserved.

He gave me a tour of his store. He had a bunch of framed photos hanging of some operators in various training scenarios. I asked him if he knew them. He didn’t. It was conspicuous to me that none of their faces were visible. They looked like some images I’d seen on the Internet.

I think he hung them there as an insinuation to his patrons that they might be pictures of him. I imagined how many times he’d pointed at the pictures and told people they were images of him at work in his military career.

It was becoming very apparent to me that I shouldn’t believe a single word that came from this guy’s mouth. I even wondered if his name was James Ingram and if we were on somebody else’s property.

I didn’t speak much the whole time I was there. Ingram did most of the talking. How was I supposed to have a conversation with a guy that seems to make up everything he says?

On the way out, I bought a battle-axe he had displayed in his case. It was a gesture of good will. Plus, good, sharp battle-axes are always good to have around in case one runs out of ammunition or needs to be quiet while conducting an assault. This particular battle-axe was one of the best I’d ever seen. Merry Christmas, self.

When I got home I updated the other Rangers on the Facebook page. Some of them were also updating their friends on the SF page. I told them about our confrontation and that we need to give Ingram a chance to rectify this situation on his own.

Some of them wanted immediate justice of some kind and had no answer to the questions, “What law is he breaking? What do you think the police are going to do about it?”

We waited. We checked his web page and the picture and the claims disappeared. It was looking like he might have learned a lesson.

(Name Redacted) got my contact information from Facebook or somewhere via a mutual contact or something. He called me and we met a few days later in Ellijay. He said he wanted to take the Ingram to court. He had a legitimate claim and I recommended that he take him to court, but I wondered openly what he thought he might gain from such an effort. (Redacted) asked me to testify if and when he got a court date. I said I would, if I could.

As the Junior Vice Commander of my VFW Post 12002, I get frequent updates on legislation affecting veterans. The Stolen Valor Act had been shot down by the Supreme Court on the grounds that it violated the 1st Amendment. I concur.

Another version had been introduced and was signed into law. It specifically listed claims that were in violation of that law. Claiming to be a Ranger or a Special Forces troop was NOT enumerated on that list. It’s very coincidental that the day after President Barrack Hussein Obama signed that into law is the day that I got a call from Jamie Ritchie stating that James Ingram was back to his old ways and that Jamie had left the business. Barrack Hussein Obama gave James Ingram the green light, it seemed, and he’d relapsed. Let’s bring the heat.

I notified the Rangers who notified the SF community. I happened to be at Fort Benning when Jamie Ritchie called. So, I drove over the Ranger Training Brigade HQ and met with the S-1 in charge of validating graduates’ claims and invalidating those of imposters. They have a vault there containing files with the names of every soldier that has ever attended Ranger School and every Ranger that has ever graduated. James Ingram was not one of them, but we knew that already.

I shared the points of contact (POC’s) for the Ranger in charge of looking up all those claims with Jamie Ritchie. Jamie notified the local media.

Coincidentally, James Ingram called the next night pleading pathetically with me, again. I told him that I don’t care so much about him that I’m concerned about what is going on with Brave Tactical, his business, which is founded on false premises. I told him I didn’t believe a word he said. I told him he needed to be true to James Ingram before anybody is ever going to start to believe anything he said. The call lasted over 40 minutes.

During that call he’d admitted to having a Ranger tab tattooed on his arm. He said he’d get it covered up and come clean about everything, again. I don’t believe anything he says. He also told me about getting marriage counseling and seeing a psychologist for his condition(s). One of the conditions he’d admitted to was being a compulsive liar. He told me it stemmed from being a neglected orphan living on the street as a kid or something. The tales never stop coming out of his mouth.

It is of my opinion that James Ingram is a compulsive liar and can’t even help himself. I hold so little regard for the profession of psychology that I will argue that I am as qualified to make that claim as anybody is. James Ingram is a compulsive liar and I’m proud to say that I have no certificate hanging on my wall that says I wasted several years and tens of thousands of dollars to be able to say that. He’s a compulsive liar. Does anybody need a degree to realize that?

As you can see, soon after Ingram pleaded with the Ranger to not “out” him, he went back to his old ways. So Ingram wants to claim accolades he never earned, and falsely promote his business with the false claims, we will make it known that he is falsely promoting himself and his business.

This is something Mr. Ingram posted on his business Facebook page before he deleted it and continued on with his lies.

“I have to stop the charade and let you folks know the truth. I am not really an Ranger or a Special Forces solider. With regret I did not tell the truth about my military back ground.I wanted to be more then I was. I was not in special operations. I was an 11 bravo papa Airborne Infantryman. A few steps down from the elite. I’m sorry very sorry. These man have sacrificed all and deserve the up most respect from all. I’m glad to finally get this off my chest. I would like to thank Mr. ***** Mr. ***** and Mr.**** for counselling me on this issue. Sorry to the 10th group and to all rangers. When your the best we all want to be like you guys. I’m very sorry I apologize.”

Several 10th group and Rangers emailed us about this guy as well, we have copies of the messages back and forth where they asked him to verify his status, to which of course he never complied.

We have yet to verify his status as an 11 Bravo, but as soon as we know we will post it here.

NOTE: Ingram is Co-Owner of this company, the other Owner is a verified Marine, the SOF guys have seen his 214.

UPDATE:20130722 As of today, when you visit the website for Brave Tactical, you get the following message:

JAMES INGRAM HAS RESIGNED AS PRESIDENT OF BRAVE TACTICAL, LLC.

BRAVE TACTICAL WILL BE CLOSING IT’S DOORS TUES. JULY 23, 2013


THANKS TO THE PATRONS OF BLUE RIDGE FOR THEIR SUPPORT

RIP, Earl "One Lung" McClung from 'Band of Brothers' | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

The shadow box of the late Earl McClung. RIP, brother.

This past week, we lost one of our most special, humble veterans -- the storied Earl "One Lung" McClung.

Earl passed away at his home in Pueblo West, Colorado, in the early morning hours of Wednesday, November 27, 2013. He was 90.

Read this nice piece below on Earl found at this excellent site.  RallyPoint.com did not contribute to this particular piece.

Please share a moment of silence with us here at RallyPoint.com to reflect on his service and sacrifice.

Sincerely,
The RallyPoint.com team


----------------------------------

In honor of Earl McClung (1923-2013)
Nov 27, 2013 // By Marcus Brotherton
Earl McClung, 1923-2013

With great sadness and tribute I write to tell of the passing of Earl “One Lung” McClung, one of the original Band of Brothers. Earl died at his home in Pueblo West, Colorado, in the early morning hours of Wednesday, November 27, 2013.

He was 90.

Earl was known as a kind-hearted family man, a gentle and affable friend to many, and a valiant warrior for his country and the cause of freedom.

Earl was born on April 27, 1923, on the Colville Indian Reservation in northeastern Washington State. He was three-eighths American Indian and proud of his ancestry.

He grew up hunting, fishing, and trapping, and killed his first deer when he was 8 years old.

Earl self-admittedly had a difficult time in school. When Pearl Harbor hit, he wanted to enlist, but he was still in high school. He was drafted at age 19 in February 1943 during his senior year, along with seven other students in his senior class. He was patriotic and wanted to do his duty.

Given his propensity to regular strenuous physical activity, Earl described basic training in Ft. Walters, Texas, as “pretty easy, kind of fun,” although he had never before been more than 100 miles away from home and found himself a bit homesick.

He volunteered to be a paratrooper and trained at Ft. Benning, Georgia. He had never been in an airplane before until the day he first jumped out of one. He joined E Company, 506th PIR, 101st Airborne when they were at Ft. Bragg, North Carolina.

Earl parachuted into Normandy on D-Day where he fought near the town of Sainte-Mère-Église. As he came down in the dark, two enemy soldiers shot at his parachute. Earl always jumped with his rifle in his hands and could see their silhouettes against the moonlight. He killed the two men shooting at him moments after he hit the ground.

In the first part of the Normandy Campaign, Earl first fought with a smattering of men from the 502nd and 82nd, until he ran into Paul Rogers and Moe Alley, two paratroopers from his unit. For three days the loosely arranged group of paratroopers fought in Sainte-Mère-Église under heavy fire.

Somewhere during that time is when Earl received his nickname. He’d been on patrol all night, then came back to safer ground where he fell asleep. A lieutenant came up and asked Alley and Rogers who the machine gunner was. They both shrugged and pointed at Earl, who was sound asleep. Earl said,

So [the lieutenant] just put the machine gun by me. I wasn’t very happy about being made a machine gunner. As far as I know that machine gun is still there. When I woke up there were some strong adjectives being thrown around. So Rogers [who was known for writing funny poems] wrote a poem about it with a line that went:

Who hung the gun on One Lung McClung?

Earl, Rogers, and Alley rejoined the rest of their company just in time for the house to house battle of Carentan.

During Operation Market Garden in Holland, Earl was first scout for Easy Company, whose task was to blow up the bridge across the Wilhelmina Canal. Earl walked ahead of his company across the bridge, then sat down behind a shade tree to rest and wait for the rest of the men to catch up. At that moment, enemy soldiers blew up the bridge first. The tree protected him from flying debris. Earl said of the experience,

The timing of that explosion—if it had been just a few moments later, they would have got the whole damn company, a few moments earlier, they would have got me. The way it worked out it didn’t get anybody. It stopped us, but nobody got hurt. We could talk across the river, but there wasn’t anything anybody could do. So I just lay down behind the tree and went to sleep. There were no Germans around. By that time they were long gone.

While fighting in Holland, Earl was hit under his knee with a piece of shrapnel. Medics bandaged it and he limped for several days, but he was never evacuated. Earl was one of the very few men of Easy Company who made it all the way through the war without being seriously wounded or killed.

Herb Suerth, Jr., one of Earl’s friends in the company, tells a story about him when the men went to Mourmelon for some R&R.

Easy Company had come off the line from Holland in late November. Everyone celebrated Thanksgiving the day after that.

Within a day or two of that we had a full retreat parade—ODs, boot shined—the guys didn’t have half the stuff they needed, and some of the other guys definitely had other thoughts about the retreat. The way some guys talked, I thought there was going to be a mutiny.

Earl McClung’s bunk was next to mine. He wasn’t moving. Just before the retreat, somebody came to Mac and said, “Hey Mac, gimme your boots.” Mac handed them over and the guy started shining them for him. I wondered what was going on. Another guy came up and said, “Hey Mac, gimme your pants. He started pressing them for Mac, and so on ‘til Mac was completely ready for the retreat.

They were polishing McClung’s boots and pressing his pants for him! They knew he wouldn’t, and if everybody in the company didn’t participate, then nobody would receive any passes.  

Over the years I’ve had to ask myself if I remember that story correctly. Now, you have to realize Earl McClung was one hell of a combat soldier, one of the best that ever was. That’s why the guys pressed his pants for him.

 Well, one night years after the war McClung, and Shifty Powers and I were drinking Calvados together and McClung says, “Y’know, I wasn’t a very good garrison soldier.” I said, “Well Mac, my impression is that you were maybe the world’s worst.” He looked right at me and said: “You’re right!”

Earl fought in the harsh winter conditions of the battle of Bastogne. He wrapped his feet in gunnysacks to keep them from freezing.

He fought in Haguenau, when the enemy was right across the river.

With the company, he pressed into Germany and personally witnessed the horrible atrocities of the concentration camps.

The road up to Hitler’s hideout, the Eagle’s Nest, was blocked by rubble. Earl climbed up and over the rocks, and as far as known was the first American in Berchtesgaden.

In Kaprun, Austria, Earl’s job was to hunt and feed prisoners of war and displaced person. Earl said,

“Kaprun—I thought I had died and gone to heaven there. I just camped out. They saw me maybe once or twice a week.”

After the war, Earl returned to the States in December 1945 and had a difficult go of it for some time. Earl described the experience,

The first Christmas, it was kinda scary back home. It’s hard to say. The kid who left wasn’t the kid who came home.

I had a pretty rough time of it. I had dreams. I’d be sound asleep and somebody would touch me and they’d end up in the closet with me choking them. I was pretty dangerous even to touch.

I got in fights. I was angry all the time. I didn’t know what it was. I knew I needed help and the only way to get it was to go back in. A little hair of the dog that bit me to get me straightened out.

So in February 1946 I reenlisted for another 18 months. Then I was okay from then on.

Earl was married during his second enlistment. His wife, Jean, was also in the service. They met in South Carolina and were married before both being discharged.

Married life helped make Earl a new man. He worked in a trucking garage for a while, then as a mail carrier for seventeen years until a back injury forced him to quit. He became a game warden and retired in 1988.

Earl and Jean had three children. One son was lost in Vietnam. A daughter was killed in a car accident.

Earl was portrayed in the HBO miniseries Band of Brothers by actor Rocky Marshall.

On a personal note, I was privileged to speak with Mr. McClung several times when I interviewed him for the 2009 compilation memoir We Who Are Alive and Remain.

Mr. McClung was best friends with Darrell “Shifty” Powers, and I spoke with him several more times while I researched the book Shifty’s War, which Mr. McClung later kindly endorsed.

I met Mr. McClung in person at one of the E Co reunions, and later at a military show and book signing in 2010 in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida, where I spoke with him at length.

I feel exceedingly honored to have known in a small way this legend of a man.

Earl McClung—thank you. You were a man who led well.

7 Best Pieces of Advice from ADM Mike Mullen, former CJCS | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
ADM Mullen was one of our greatest Navy leaders from this era of conflict, and he ultimately rose to the position of the highest military officer in the US Department of Defense.

Read some of our favorite ADM Mullen advice.  Did we leave out anything you expected to see from him?

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team



We cannot kill our way to victory.
(On NATO in Afghanistan, Washington, D.C., 11 September 2008)

Let us all be men and women in full. Let us expect from ourselves more than we think we can give, more than we think we can do and more than we think we already know.
(To Army War College Graduates, Carlisle Barracks, PA, 7 June 2008)

This is the sort of advice and counsel you might find yourself delivering one day to a future President or Secretary of Defense. When you do, make sure it your best, most independent military opinion—neither constrained nor contaminated by personal politics. Part of the deal we made when we joined up was to willingly subordinate our individual interests to the greater good of protecting national interests. The military as an institution must remain a neutral instrument of the state, no matter which party holds sway. We give our best advice beforehand. If it's followed, great. If it's not, we have only two choices. Obey the orders we have been given, carrying them out with the professionalism and loyalty they deserve or vote with our feet. That's it. We don't get to debate those orders after the fact. We don't get to say, "Well, it's not how I would have done it," or "If only they had listened to ME." Too late at that point … and too cowardly. Few things are more damaging to our democracy than a military officer who doesn't have the moral courage to stand up for what's right or the moral fiber to step aside when circumstances dictate.
USNA Commencement Address in Annapolis, MD (23 May 2008)


There is, I am convinced, a sea of goodwill out in the country of people and places yearning to help. We need to tap into it. We need to make that connection. We need to come up with new ways and new ideas to make life better for those affected by this war, so that kids can go to school, incomes can be sustained, and homes can be both purchased and lived in for a long time. The truth is, we live in deeds, not days; in actions and thoughts and feelings, not heartbeats. If the untimely battlefield deaths of generations of American heroes have taught us nothing else, it should be this unalterable fact: what you do with your time here on earth is far more important than the time you had to do it. Those who live most are those who love most, who act the noblest and do their best.
From Op-Ed "Memorial Day" (26 May 2008)



If you listen closely to the voices of our veterans, you understand that yes, they all returned from war changed, but what never changed is this: They never forgot your generosity. They never forgot the power of opportunity. They never forgot the American dream. They want a job; they want their kids to go to school; they’d like an education, a career, a home. They want to make a difference. It is vital for communities throughout the land to be able to join up – in concert with DOD, VA – so that this dream is still possible for them – for those that sacrificed so much. But it goes far beyond what government can do. We must share the burdens of this war – now the longest conflict this nation has faced with an all-volunteer force since the American Revolution. I am convinced that America’s great sea of goodwill can be, in fact, a rising tide … a tide that could lift every veteran and every family of our wounded and fallen.
(To Soldiers' Angels Gala, Washington, D.C., 6 November 2008)

It is a really important place to not go, if we can not go there in any way, shape or form.
(On attacking Iran, Washington, D.C., July 2009)

Mr. Chairman, speaking for myself and myself only, it is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do. No matter how I look at this issue, I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy that forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens.
(Congressional testimony on repealing DADT, 2 February 2010)

(VIDEO) Throwback: Rep. Tammy Duckworth Shames IRS Contractor for Abusing VA Benefits | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
The object of this inquiry, Braulio Castillo, allegedly took half a billion dollars in contracts from the IRS partly by claiming he was a wounded war vet. He used a fake war injury which was actually a military prep school injury. He claimed his ankle was broken but X-Rays showed it was not.

The contracts were steered towards him by an IRS agent who is his friend, Greg Roseman. Roseman took the Fifth.

-- The RallyPoint.com team


-------------------

By Clare Kim

Iraq War veteran and double-amputee Rep. Tammy Duckworth shamed a federal contractor during a congressional hearing Wednesday, accusing him of  taking advantage of the system for veterans benefits.

During a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing, Braulio Castillo, an IRS contractor, was summoned to testify for questionable IRS contracts. Castillo, the owner of Strong Castle Inc., claimed that an injury to his left foot justified his IT company receiving special status as a service-disabled, veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB). Castillo sustained his injury while playing football at his military prep school, The United States Military Academy Preparatory School (USMAPS), in 1984. While Castillo never entered active duty, the Veterans Benefits Administration stipulates that if an individual is injured at preparatory school, “he or she becomes a veteran due to the service-connected disability.”

“This hearing is very troubling to me because this case really shows how things can go wrong,” Rep. Duckworth said in her opening remarks. “I want to support our small business owners as much as possible. I want these set-asides to be successful, but I am absolutely appalled by the advantages that have been taken of the system.”

According to a House oversight report, Castillo filed a disability claim with the Veterans Affairs department just before starting his company, citing the “significant” pain in his foot. He began to receive monthly checks. Within six months of founding his company in early 2012, Castillo started receiving up to $500 million worth in contracts. Committee investigators started to question the IRS contracts specifically set aside for the company and found that Castillo’s disability service rating of 30% enabled him to register his company to become eligible for preferential treatment in bidding competitions.



Castillo also chose Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown as a location for Strong Castle, Inc. Chinatown is designated a government “hub zone,” which meant that Castillo’s company qualified for even more contract bidding. Committee investigators reported their findings to the IRS but the IRS told the committee that it would be too disruptive to cancel a contract worth $260 million. Questioning both the timeline and eligibility, the House committee asked Castillo and IRS officials to testify on Wednesday.

“Does your foot hurt,” Duckworth asked Castillo. “My feet hurt too. In fact, the balls of my feet burn continuously, and I feel like there’s a nail being hammered into my heel right now. So I can understand pain and suffering, and how service connection can actually cause long-term, unremitting, unyielding, unstoppable pain.”

“So I’m sorry that twisting your ankle in high school has now come back to hurt you in such a painful, if also opportune, way for you to gain this status for your business as you were trying to compete for contracts.”

Duckworth read from a letter Castillo sent to a government official in which he describes the severe pains from his foot injury as “crosses that I bear in my service to our great country.  And I would do it again to protect this great country.”

“I’m so glad that you would be willing to play football in prep school again to protect this great country,” said Duckworth. “Shame on you, Mr. Castillo. Shame on you. You may not have broken any laws… But you certainly broke the trust of this great nation. You broke the trust of veterans.”

“Iraq and Afghanistan veterans right now are waiting an average of 237 days for an initial disability rating, and it is because people like you who are gaming the system are adding to that backlog so that young men and women who are suffering from post-traumatic stress, who are missing limbs, cannot get the compensation and the help that they need.”

“You, who never picked up a weapon in defense of this great nation, very cynically took advantage of the system. You broke the faith with this nation. You broke the faith with the men and women who lie in hospitals right now.”

“Twisting your ankle in prep school is not defending or serving this nation, Mr. Castillo,” the congresswoman concluded.

Before winning her House seat from Illinois last November, Duckworth was a Army helicopter pilot. She lost both legs and severely injured her right arm in November 2004. She was awarded a Purple Heart. After undergoing rehabilitation, she became director of the Veterans Affairs department in Illinois and later served as Assistant Secretary in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Original article located here.

(VIDEO) Navy Launches Tomahawk Missiles to Stop Libya Unrest | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

Tomahawk missile launched at Qaddafi

Check out this awesome footage of Tomahawk cruise missiles being launched towards Qadhafi regime forces as a part of JTF Odyssey Dawn.

USS Stout (DDG-55) wasa part of Task Force Odyssey Dawn, the U.S. Africa Command task force established to provide operational and tactical command and control of U.S. military forces supporting the international response to the unrest in Libya and enforcement of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973.

UNSCR 1973 authorizes all necessary measures to protect civilians in Libya under threat of attack by Qadhafi regime forces.

JTF Odyssey Dawn was commanded by U.S. Navy Admiral Samuel J. Locklear, III.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team



The 5 Deadliest Battles in History | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
You may already be familiar with the deadlier wars that involved US military forces, even stretching back to the pre-Constitution era.

But, how well do you know world history in this same regard?

Here at RallyPoint.com, we did some research to bring you the 5 deadliest battles in world military history, complete with context and relevant data.

Do any of these surprise you?  Let us know here.

Enjoy!

-- The RallyPoint.com team

------------------

5. Battle of Gettysburg, 1863

Belligerents: Union vs Confederacy
Casualties: Unionists 23,000; Confederates 23,000
Total: 46,000
Result: Union victory

The day the tide of war turned in favour of the Union during the American Civil War, was also the day that saw the highest number of casualties in a single battle throughout the entire conflict. After a series of Confederate victories, General Lee led his troops north to invade Union territory. Fighting raged back and forth for three days before the Unionists emerged triumphant. The battle is remembered as the battle of the Civil War, immortalised by the Gettysburg address and standing as a symbol of the Union’s cause and eventual victory.

Gettysburg military deaths facts

4. The Battle of Cannae, 216 BC

Belligerents: Carthage vs Rome
Casualties: Carthaginians 10,000; Romans 50,000
Total: 60,000
Result: Carthaginian victory

The Carthaginian general Hannibal, having marched his army across the Alps and defeated two Roman armies at Trebia and Lake Trasimene, sought to engage the Romans in a final decisive battle. The Romans concentrated their heavy infantry in the centre, hoping to smash through the middle of the Carthaginian army. Hannibal, on the other hand, deployed his finest troops on the flanks of his army, anticipating the central Roman attack. As the Carthaginian centre collapsed, the sides folded in on the Roman flanks. The mass of legionaries in the rear ranks forced the front ranks unstoppably forward, not knowing they were enveloping themselves. Eventually, the Carthaginian cavalry swept round and closed the gap, completely surrounding the Roman army. In the close quarters battle, the legionaries, with no way of escape, were forced to fight to the death. The result was the loss of 50,000 Roman citizens and two consuls.


3. The first day of the Somme, 1 July 1916

Belligerents: Britain vs Germany
Casualties: British 60,000; German 8,000
Total: 68,000
Result: Indecisive
The bloodiest day in the history of the British Army was suffered during the initial stages of a battle that would last for several months, result in over a million dead, and leave the tactical situation largely unchanged. The plan was for an artillery barrage to pound the German defences to an extent that the attacking British and French could just walk in and occupy the opposing trenches. The bombardment did not have the devastating effect expected. As soon as the soldiers emerged from the trenches, German machine-gun positions opened up. Poorly coordinated artillery meant that advancing infantry was often shelled by their own supporting fire or left dangerously exposed as their creeping barrage left them unprotected. By nightfall, few of the objectives had been taken, despite massive loss of life. The attack would continue in a similar vein until October that year.

Somme was the 3rd deadliest war

2. The Battle of Leipzig, 1813

Belligerents: France vs Austria, Prussia and Russia
Casualties: French 30,000; Allies 54,000
Total: 84,000
Result: Coalition victory

The battle of Leipzig represents the most decisive defeat suffered by Napoleon, and the largest battle fought on European soil prior to the outbreak of World War One. Facing attacks from all directions, the French army performed remarkably well, holding attackers at bay for more than nine hours before being overwhelmed by sheer weight of numbers. With defeat imminent, Napoleon began an orderly withdrawal across the single bridge still standing. The bridge was blown too early, stranding 20,000 French soldiers, many of whom would drown whilst attempting to cross the river. The defeat opened the door for an Allied advance into France itself.

1. The Battle of Stalingrad, 1942-1943

Belligerents: Nazi Germany vs Soviet Union
Casualties: German 841,000; Soviet Union 1,130,000
Total: 1,971,000
Result: Soviet victory

The German offensive began with a devastating series of bombings from the Luftwaffe, which left much of Stalingrad in ruins. But the bombing created a highly dispensable landscape. As the army advanced, however, they found themselves caught up in brutal house-to-house fighting with the Soviets. Although they were in control of more the 90% of the city, the Wehrmacht could not extricate the remaining stubborn Soviet soldiers. The weather began to turn bitterly cold, and in November 1942 the Red Army launched a two-pronged attack on the German 6th Army in Stalingrad. The flanks collapsed and the 6th Army was surrounded, both by the Red Army and the crippling Russian winter. Starvation, cold, and sporadic Soviet attacks began to take their toll. Yet Hitler refused to allow the 6th Army to retreat. By February 1943, after a failed German attempt to break out and with all supply lines had cut, the 6th Army was crushed.

Stalingrad was the deadliest war in history


Hat tip to this historical site for some of the data.

The Ugly Side of 'Condition Not A Disability' Rating? | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0

Navy physicians too often fail to submit medical issues for disability evaluation, as regulations require. Instead they allow members to be discharged for Condition Not A Disability, a faster and less costly administrative discharge than would occur with referral to a medical board.

This, according to an advocate for wounded warriors.

Intriguing article, to say the least.

-- The RallyPoint.com team


----------------------

TOM PHILPOTT

Navy Department medical personnel are misusing an administrative separation authority called "Condition Not A Disability" on many sailors and Marines whose medical conditions should be screened through the disability evaluation system, an advocate for wounded warriors is charging.

"The use of administrative discharges for conditions that require DES [disability evaluation system] processing simply has to stop," retired Army Lt. Col. Michael A. Parker told the Department of Defense's Recovering Warrior Task Force last month at its latest public hearing.

Navy physicians too often fail to submit medical issues for disability evaluation, as regulations require, Parker said.  Instead they allow members to be discharged for Condition Not A Disability, a faster and less costly administrative discharge than would occur with referral to a medical board.

The consequence for sailors and Marines is discharge without a disability rating and compensation, or without a lifetime disability retirement that they might deserve, Parker contends.

In an interview, Vice Adm. Matthew Nathan, Navy surgeon general and current co-chair of the task force, conceded there has been "inconsistency among some [health care] providers in what they consider to be separating issues versus a disability issue." But he added, "In my experience there hasn't been a pre-conceived design to use this to separate folks."

Defense Department Instruction 1332.38 lists conditions for which Condition Not a Disability should be used to separate members.  They include urinary incontinence, sleepwalking, severe nightmares, dyslexia or other learning disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stuttering, incapacitating fear of flying, or airsickness, motion or travel sickness.

Navy physicians have used it far more widely, Parker claims.  Separation data from the services appear to support his argument.  From fiscal 2010 through 2013, an average of almost 1300 sailors and 1540 Marines per year were separated for Condition Not a Disability. Over the same period, Air Force used this authority an average of 22 times a year.

Army data are kept in way that doesn't allow comparison. It tracks total separations for conditions not disabling including personality disorder, which other service branches track separately.  [A 2010 congressional investigation found Army had abused use of personality disorder, viewed as a pre-service condition, to separate soldiers with post-traumatic stress, which should result in a service-connected disability and sometimes retirement.]

But Parker said he knew of only one soldier, and no airmen, separated under Condition Not a Disability for a medical condition not listed in the CDN regulation, suggesting its misuse is largely a Navy Department problem.

Former Navy Hospital Corpsman Todd Bruder says he fell victim to it. A year ago, while assigned to Camp Pendleton, Calif., for field medical training, Bruder broke his right foot during command physical training, a simple misstep in a flag football game. Bruder said he felt "pops" in his foot.

The next morning it was swollen and bruised, and x-rays showed fractures in the joint of his big toe and in the sesamoid bone behind it.

The orthopedic clinic at Pendleton advised Bruder to stay off the foot and it would heal.  It didn't.  Though he stopped using a protective boot after several weeks, walking remained painful.  By April he was referred to a Navy podiatrist who also advised that the breaks would take time to heal.

By mid-summer, Bruder needed steroid injections to relieve the pain.  Yet a podiatrist wrote in Bruder's medical file that his fractures had healed.  A bone scan showed the sesamoid, in fact, had not mended.
In August, doctors rejected Bruder's request for a medical evaluation board, deemed him unfit for continued service by Condition Not a Disability and he was discharged, ending his six-year Navy career at age 29.

Back home in Austin, Texas, a primary care physician referred Bruder to an orthopedic surgeon who confirmed one break had not healed, asked why the Navy had not operated and now recommended surgery to remove the sesamoid bone.  Bruder, married with a child, has put off surgery, at first to be able to find a job and now, having one, to be able to keep it.

Meanwhile, Bruder said, he limps, walking only on the outside of his right foot to lessen the pain, and takes pain medication daily Parker points to other cases too and says he worries that if the Navy Department doesn't take corrective action to halt this practice, abuse of Condition Not a Disability could expand, particularly with the Marine Corps drawing down by more than 20,000 troops over the next several years.



Navy physicians do face a "conundrum," said Surgeon General Nathan, when patients have conditions that prevent return to full duty and yet doctors can't find an effective treatment or even confirm a condition.

"I think there have been inconsistencies," Nathan said. "Sometimes we have young providers, especially early on in a conflict, who are new to the system and don't understand all the nuances.  We work very hard to look for areas where we may see discrepancies, and to educate providers and have commands understand."

Still, Nathan added, when members face discharge for Condition Not a Disability, they should be able to "go to their chain of command and to their service, and say, ‘Can somebody look at this and tell me if I could have a second review?'"

Nathan suggested that after more than a decade of war, the medical system and its personnel have a lot of experience and knowledge on disabling conditions and on out-processing individuals found unfit.
"Does that mean there's not an errant individual out there who, by innocence, doesn't understand the differences between separation and the IDES [individual disability evaluation system]?  It's possible," Nathan said.  But the "chance of these things falling through the cracks is much less."

He adamantly disagrees with suggestions "that anybody does it intentionally as a way to separate somebody and save the taxpayers money."

Any improper use of Condition Not a Disability he has reviewed, Nathan said, shows only that "individuals didn't understand the system."

Original article here.

----------------------

Americans Fighting in the Syrian Civil War, and Why That's a Huge Problem | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
Americans are joining the Syria civil war

Based on personal or religious convictions, Americans continue to join the bloody civil war in Syria.  This creates myriad concerns for the US -- namely that these individuals will one day return to the US (after all, they are still citizens) as radicalized and battle-tested al-Qaeda supporters.

Tell us how you think the US should respond!

-- The RallyPoint.com team

----------------------

Associated Press
by Emery P. Dalesio

RALEIGH, N.C. - Federal officials say Americans are joining the bloody civil war in Syria, raising the chances they could become radicalized by al-Qaida-linked militant groups and return to the U.S. as battle-hardened security risks.

The State Department says it has no estimates of how many Americans have taken up weapons to fight military units loyal to Syrian President Bashar Assad in the conflict that has killed more than 100,000 people over 2 1/2 years. Other estimates - from an arm of the British defense consultant IHS Jane's and from experts at a nonprofit think tank in London - put the number of Americans at a couple dozen. The IHS group says al-Qaida-linked fighters number about 15,000, with total anti-Assad force at 100,000 or more.


This year, at least three Americans have been charged with planning to fight beside Jabhat al-Nusrah - a radical Islamic organization that the U.S. considers a foreign terrorist group - against Assad. The most recent case involves a Pakistan-born North Carolina man arrested on his way to Lebanon.

At a Senate homeland security committee hearing this month, Sen. Thomas Carper, D-Del., said: "We know that American citizens as well as Canadian and European nationals have taken up arms in Syria, in Yemen and in Somalia. The threat that these individuals could return home to carry out attacks is real and troubling."

The hearing came about two weeks after the FBI and other officers arrested Basit Sheikh, 29, at the Raleigh-Durham International Airport on charges he was on his way to join Jabhat al-Nusrah. Sheikh, a legal resident of the United States, had lived quietly, without a criminal record, in a Raleigh suburb for five years before his Nov. 2 arrest. A similar arrest came in April in Chicago. And in September, authorities in Virginia released an Army veteran accused of fighting alongside the group after a secret plea deal.

In August, outgoing FBI Director Robert Mueller told ABC News that he was concerned about Americans fighting in Syria, specifically "the associations they will make and, secondly, the expertise they will develop, and whether or not they will utilize those associations, utilize that expertise, to undertake an attack on the homeland."


Current FBI Director James Comey said this month that he worried about Syria becoming a repeat of Afghanistan in the 1980s, after the Soviet invasion, with foreign fighters attracted there to train. The FBI refused to say whether it's directed agents to increase efforts to stop Americans bound for Syria.
In the case of Sheikh, his North Carolina home isn't considered a breeding ground for terrorist activity. But Aaron Zelin, who works for both the London-based International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, notes that Sheikh lived about three hours from the hometown of Samir Khan, the editor of an English-language al-Qaida magazine who was killed in a drone attack in Yemen.

Sheikh is charged with planning to assist a group the State Department has declared a terrorist organization. It's not illegal for Americans who also hold citizenship in another country to fight in that country's military. But American citizenship can be lost for voluntarily serving in foreign armed forces hostile to the U.S.

For five months this year, Sheikh didn't know he was being monitored as he posted messages and videos on Facebook expressing support for jihadi militants fighting Assad's forces, according to a Nov. 2 sworn affidavit by FBI Special Agent Jason Maslow in support of the warrant to arrest Sheikh.
In August, Sheikh commented to an undercover FBI employee's posts on a Facebook page promoting Islamic extremism. The two struck up an online relationship, the affidavit said. Sheikh told the informant he planned to trek to Syria to join "a brigade in logistics, managing medical supplies." Days later, Sheikh said he'd bought a one-way ticket to travel to Turkey in hopes of making contact with people who would get him to Syria.

Sheikh said he backed out because "he could not muster the strength to leave his parents," the affidavit said. Sheikh said he had traveled to Turkey last year hoping to join the fight in Syria, but became dispirited by his experience with people who claimed to be part of the U.S.-backed Free Syrian Army.

After Sheikh expressed online support for Jabhat al-Nusrah and interest in traveling to the war zone, the FBI employee suggested Sheikh contact a person with the group - another FBI informant.

Sheikh made contract, describing Jabhat al-Nusrah as the most disciplined group of anti-Assad fighters, the affidavit said. "I'm not scared," Sheikh wrote, according to the affidavit. "I'm ready."

Two federal public defenders appointed to represent Sheikh are barred by local court practice from discussing their cases, spokeswoman Elizabeth Luck said. Sheikh's father, Javed Sheikh, said his son was falsely accused but that he trusts U.S. courts to find the truth.

A federal magistrate ruled that Sheikh should be detained until his trial because there was clear evidence that he wouldn't appear if released on bond and that there was a "serious risk" to the community if he were freed.

Basit Sheikh's arraignment is scheduled for January. He could face up to 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine if convicted.

Air Force Academy Secretly Recruits Cadets to Spy on Each Other | RallyPoint.com

$
0
0
Air Force Academy accused of spying

News this week out of the Air Force Academy, the nation's premier commissioning source for the USAF, has many of its alums and supporters rattled. Academy leaders recruited cadets in secret to spy on each other, with the stated intent of combating sexual assault and misconduct problems.  At least according to reports.

So, do the ends justify the means?

Read this intriguing piece.

-- The RallyPoint.com team

---------------

The Gazette, Colorado Springs, Colo.
by Dave Philipps

The United States Air Force reportedly has created a “secret system” of informants at its academy in Colorado Springs to snitch on fellow cadets who break the rules, in an attempt to curb drug abuse and combat sexual assault.

While those who join the Air Force pledge never to lie, cheat or steal, or "tolerate among us anyone who does,” the service allegedly urged informants to deceive classmates, professors and commanders while gathering information to file secret reports aimed at exposing wrongdoing at the Air Force Academy, the Colorado Springs Gazette reports. One self-professed informant, Eric Thomas, 24, told the newspaper he was ordered by the Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations to set up drug purchases, follow suspected rapists and to ultimately feed that information back to Air Force brass.


“It was exciting. And it was effective,” Thomas, who said he received no compensation for his alleged informant work, told the paper. “We got 15 convictions of drugs, two convictions of sexual assault. We were making a difference. It was motivating, especially with the sexual assaults. You could see the victims have a sense of peace.”

But Thomas said that when he got into a fight with a perpetrator while trying to stop an alleged sexual assault, OSI officials eventually cut all ties and disavowed knowledge of his actions. He was later kicked out of the academy, the newspaper reported.

“It was like a spy movie,” Thomas, who was expelled in April, a month before graduation, told the paper. “I worked on dozens of cases, did a lot of good, and when it all hit the fan, they didn’t know me anymore.”

The Colorado Springs Gazette, which first reported the development on Sunday, identified four alleged informants, three of whom agreed to speak about their experience with OSI. All four had been told they were the only informant on campus, but they eventually learned of each other. The alleged informants interviewed by The Gazette told the newspaper they suspect the campus of 4,400 cadets to have dozens of informants currently on campus.

The Air Force’s top commander and members of the academy’s civilian oversight board claim to have no knowledge of the OSI program. The Gazette, however, reported that it confirmed the program via phone and text records, OSI agents, court filings and documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.


Lt. Col. Allen Herritage, a spokesman for the Air Force, told FoxNews.com in a statement that the Air Force Office of Special Investigations does use confidential sources to launch or conclude criminal probes.

"The Air Force Office of Special Investigations, as a federal law enforcement agency, is authorized by Air Force policy to operate a Confidential Informant Program Air Force-wide, including at the Air Force Academy," Herritage wrote in a statement. "The program uses people who confidentially provide vital information for initiating or resolving criminal investigations. OSI does not discuss the existence of ongoing or past confidential informant matters, as doing so could damage the integrity of current and future investigations."

The Air Force’s Office of Special Investigations, according to records obtained by the newspaper, uses “FBI-style tactics” to develop informants, including interrogation for hours without access to an attorney and threats of prosecution in exchange for promises of leniency, the paper reported.

“When finished with informants, OSI takes steps to hide their existence, directing cadets to delete emails and messages, misleading Air Force commanders and Congress, and withholding documents they are required to release under the Freedom of Information Act,” the newspaper reports. “The program also appears to rely disproportionately on minority cadets like Thomas,” who is African-American.

Skip Morgan, a former OSI attorney who headed the law department at the academy, is now representing Thomas.

“Their behavior in [Thomas’] case goes beyond merely disappointing, and borders on despicable,” Morgan wrote in a letter to the superintendent of the academy in April. The superintendent did not reply, the newspaper reported.

---------------

Viewing all 1044 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images